Where you sponsor your WordPress site can be the difference in the middle of your site running well, and countless string of specialized headaches. It’s an important decision! But with so many to choose from (plus some really slick marketing), how will you know which web host is best for you? This post has been revised and updated for 2019. After 5 years, we still use and recommend SiteGround. Building your site on the incorrect host is like building your house on unstable soil – things look fine initially, but the cracks start to appear eventually. In website terms, these cracks can range between intermittent technical glitches to the shortcoming to implement new content or capabilities on your site.
Really, who needs this sort of headaches if you are trying to run a business? It is important to understand that not every website host in the market is creating equivalent. Let’s not pretend – creating and owning a website hosting system is technically challenging. I won’t bore you with the facts, but that lot is going on behind the moments to make sure your content shows up on the visitor’s browser when they request it.
- FTP username,
- Creating video items for social mass media can improve conversion rate
- Load Optimized Defaults
- Select the version of Windows compatible with the computer printer
It requires real technical expertise, plus some serious investment in infrastructure, to keep everything properly working. The problem for all of us as consumers is that some companies are far better at marketing than they are in managing the technical complexities (I’m taking a look at you GoDaddy!). Before you pick the best website web host (and plan) for your website, you need to understand the various types of hosting available.
With shared environment, each physical server (think PC) can be used to provide many websites. All of the files for every website reside on the main one box, and the memory space and processing power of that box have to be shared between your sites. It’ like running multiple programs on your own computer.
As long as you do not run way too many, and each of them behaves beautifully, all works fine then. But if you have many programs open too, or one starts chewing up the processing power or memory, then all of them grind to a halt. The same goes for all the websites on the shared server. The common number of sites on each server is low – under 150 is great; over 1,000 should be a deal-breaker. Strong accounts segregation is in place. The best security on your site is worthless if malware can hop from one site to yours through the document system on the server.
You may need to contact the host’s online support to get this information, as it’s generally not detailed on the site. Which do you consider has more chance of experiencing performance issues? This sort of hosting has many websites on the one container still, but you get a dedicated part of the processing power and memory (that no other sites can steal from you). Essentially, you get a own (virtual) server but with a complete great deal less control power and memory space than a full server. Note that the amount of processing power and memory you get still depends on how many other sites are hosted on the same server.
The up aspect is that other sites on the same server won’t slow your site down like they can on a shared environment. With this type of hosting, you’re given a single use of the physical server – all the handling power and memory are yours to use as you want.